The Market Problem
2 ▪ The Market Problem
Why does the world need another trading platform? Because the current landscape systematically bleeds value from those who have the least margin for error.
2.1 ▪ Retail Investors Lose ‑ Structural Gaps in Modern Crypto Markets
Information Asymmetry High‑frequency desks ingest terabytes of order‑book data per second, run micro‑strategies co‑located next to exchange servers, and hedge exposures within milliseconds. A retail trader, by contrast, refreshes a web chart, reads Twitter, and fires a market order that crosses half the spread before it even enters the matching engine. The statistical outcome is inevitable: according to aggregated exchange reports (2022‑2023), more than 78 % of newcomer portfolios underperform buy‑and‑hold within 90 days.
Tooling Deficit Institutions rely on portfolio‑wide risk engines—VaR, stress testing, correlation matrices—that dynamically size positions. Retail users make sizing decisions on gut feel or scattered calculators. Without systematic controls, a single adverse candle can trigger catastrophic drawdowns.
Fraud & Noise Cost Rug pulls, Discord pump rooms, plagiarised NFT flips—each cycle siphons billions from small holders. Market watchdogs estimate US $9.9 B in retail losses to outright scams in 2023 alone. Capital flight from genuine projects follows, stifling broader ecosystem growth.
2.2 ▪ Copy‑Trading Is Broken — The False Promise of "Follow to Win"
Copy‑trading should equalise access to professional edge, yet real‑world data shows most followers still lose. Why?
Latency Tax (∆t). Web2 mirrors execute sequentially: leader fills first, followers queue through API rate limits. A 3‑second delay on a 50 bps move wipes the edge entirely.
Opaque Metrics. “Top trader” tables count absolute PnL, ignoring risk, starting capital or survivorship bias. A trader can 100× leverage a $100 account, display a flashy 5 000 % month, then reset the clock after liquidation—leaderboard intact.
Perverse Incentives. Influencers get paid per copier or volume rebate, not peer profitability. The rational (yet unethical) strategy is to encourage high‑churn, high‑fee gambling, not steady gains.
2.3 ▪ Trust Deficit — When Transparency Isn’t Truly Transparent
Most “crypto copy” apps still route orders off‑chain via custodial pools or API keys invisible to users. That black box hides:
Order Routing Favouritism: A platform can batch user orders to arbitrage internal spreads, pocketing the difference.
Shadow Hedging: A leader may offset risk on alternative venues, letting followers absorb volatility.
Data Censorship: Negative streaks can be hidden through selective disclosure or account resets.
Without immutable, publicly verifiable audit trails, the promise of decentralisation collapses back into Web2 trust assumptions.
2.4 ▪ The P2A Fix — Programmable Trust & Aligned Economics
P2A reframes the entire relationship between skill and capital by embedding rules directly into code:
Proof‑Linked Performance — Every trade hash, fill price and fee rebate is committed to a tamper‑evident log, hashed on‑chain. Anyone can recalculate ROI from raw fills.
Earn‑When‑They‑Earn Fee Logic — Smart contracts trigger Agent revenue only on net new Peer profit above a high‑water mark. No win for the Peer, no pay‑out for the Agent—simple.
Stake‑Guarded Reputation — Agents lock $P2A against their strategy NFT. Underperformance or misconduct burns stake, instantly lowering ranking and funding the insurance fund that backstops users.
Composable Delegation Vaults — Peers keep private keys; contracts only execute within preset risk envelopes. Exit is a single transaction—no 24‑hour withdrawals, no admin keys.
The result is a mutually reinforcing flywheel: skill proves itself, capital flows in, protocol fees seed treasury growth, treasury funds audits and R&D, which attract more skill—and the cycle compounds.
Last updated